History
  • No items yet
midpage
Walker v. Randal
1925 Pa. Super. LEXIS 301
Pa. Super. Ct.
1924
Check Treatment

Argued December 3, 1924. The plaintiff recovered a verdict of $2,500. After argument, a new trial was refused and judgment entered against the defendant. In an opinion filed by the trial judge, every pertinent question is reviewed and disposed of. Under the authorities cited, we see no reason for disturbing the verdict.

The judgment is affirmed.

Case Details

Case Name: Walker v. Randal
Court Name: Superior Court of Pennsylvania
Date Published: Dec 3, 1924
Citation: 1925 Pa. Super. LEXIS 301
Docket Number: Appeal, 67
Court Abbreviation: Pa. Super. Ct.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.