Walker v. North Jersey Street Railway Co.

| N.J. | Mar 16, 1910

Per Curiam.

The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the above memorandum.

For affirmance. — Tite Chancellor, Garrison, Reed, Trenohabd, Bergen, Yoorhees, Mintuen, Bogert, Vre-DENBURGH, YROOM, Dl LL, CONGDON, JJ. 12.

For reversal — Hone.