History
  • No items yet
midpage
Walker v. Humphrey
96 Fla. 666
| Fla. | 1928
|
Check Treatment

H. A. Humphrey brought an action of replevin against J. C. Walker to recover certain mules and wagons that Humphrey claimed to own and that Walker detained unlawfully. At the conclusion of the testimony motion for an instructed verdict on the part of the plaintiff was granted. A new trial was denied and writ of error was taken to this court.

In the state of the record as here presented we think that error was committed in granting the motion for an instructed verdict. It was also competent for defendant to submit evidence to prove that at the time payments were made by him where more than one account was outstanding he could direct the account to which said payments were to be credited.

The judgment below is reversed and a new trial awarded. *Page 667

WHITFIELD, P. J., AND TERRELL AND BUFORD, J. J., concur.

ELLIS, C. J., AND STRUM AND BROWN, J. J., concur in the opinion and judgment.

Case Details

Case Name: Walker v. Humphrey
Court Name: Supreme Court of Florida
Date Published: Dec 4, 1928
Citation: 96 Fla. 666
Court Abbreviation: Fla.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.