History
  • No items yet
midpage
Walker v. Hillyer
119 Ga. 225
Ga.
1903
Check Treatment
Kish, P. J.

1. The words “ Approved by,” signed in his official capacity by the magistrate of the court in which the case was originally tried, were endorsed on a certiorari bond, and the magistrate certified that the plaintiff in certiorari had “paid all costs in the case (amounting to $(5.75), the subject-matter of the . . petition [for certiorari] and [had] given bond and security as required by law : ” Held, that there was a sufficient, compliance with the statute requiring, in such cases, the approval and acceptance of the bond, and the giving of the certificate of the payment of all costs that have accrued.

2. The record clearly shows that the verdict in the justice’s court was not demanded under the law and the evidence. Consequently this court will not interfere with the first grant of a new trial by the superior court. Shirley v. Swafford, ante, 43.

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concur. ■ Certiorari. Before Judge Henry. Floyd superior court. April 14-1903. . - ' Henry Walker, for plaintiffs in error. Alexander & Hillyer, contra.

Case Details

Case Name: Walker v. Hillyer
Court Name: Supreme Court of Georgia
Date Published: Dec 12, 1903
Citation: 119 Ga. 225
Court Abbreviation: Ga.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.