69 Iowa 741 | Iowa | 1886
This case is before us upon a second appeal. The first opinion is reported in 63 Iowa, 627.
An attempt to raise the question of admissibility of evidence to show such parol consent was made upon the former hearing; but, as the question did not appear to arise properly upon the record, it was not determined. Upon the former hearing it appeared that the inquiry was made as to
Aside from the consideration above expressed, some of the members of the court think that the defendant could not have been prejudiced. While we have not expressly considered all the errors assigned, we think that the views which we have expressed cover them substantially.
We see no error in the rulings of the court, and the judgment must be .
Affirmed.