History
  • No items yet
midpage
Walker v. . Dickerson
3 N.C. 23
Sup. Ct. N.C.
1797
Check Treatment

A similar objection prevailed in a case reported by Dallas, 120; and the same doctrine seems to be hinted at in 1 Term, 313. I am, however, of opinion, when two persons enter into partnership, it is understood by them and also by others to whom their partnership is known, that they are reciprocally empowered, the one by the other, to sign the name of that other to all obligatory instruments occasioned by *Page 42 their joint concern, as much so as if he had been expressly appointed an attorney by the other to execute that bond in his name, and then the bond is well executed to bind both.

Verdict and judgment for the plaintiff.

NOTE. — See Anonymous, post, 99; Person v. Carter, 7 N.C. 321,contra.

(24)

Case Details

Case Name: Walker v. . Dickerson
Court Name: Superior Court of North Carolina
Date Published: Jul 5, 1797
Citation: 3 N.C. 23
Court Abbreviation: Sup. Ct. N.C.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.