6 Div. 958. | Ala. | Jun 18, 1931

There is no opinion by the Court of Appeals. Affirmed on the authority of Lawson *414 v. State, 219 Ala. 461" court="Ala." date_filed="1929-05-02" href="https://app.midpage.ai/document/rudulph-v-burgin-3236742?utm_source=webapp" opinion_id="3236742">219 Ala. 461, 122 So. 467" court="Ala. Ct. App." date_filed="1928-10-30" href="https://app.midpage.ai/document/mullins-lambert-gin-co-v-reneau-3244518?utm_source=webapp" opinion_id="3244518">122 So. 467; Cofield v. City of Anniston, 220 Ala. 697" court="Ala." date_filed="1929-10-24" href="https://app.midpage.ai/document/continental-gin-co-v-connell-3251779?utm_source=webapp" opinion_id="3251779">220 Ala. 697, 124 So. 916" court="Ala." date_filed="1929-10-24" href="https://app.midpage.ai/document/continental-gin-co-v-connell-3251779?utm_source=webapp" opinion_id="3251779">124 So. 916, as there is nothing to review. Review on certiorari here is limited to a review of the opinion of that court, not the record and judgment therein.

Writ denied.

ANDERSON, C. J., and SAYRE and BROWN, JJ., concur.

© 2024 Midpage AI does not provide legal advice. By using midpage, you consent to our Terms and Conditions.