History
  • No items yet
midpage
Waldron v. Marsh
5 Cal. 119
Cal.
1855
Check Treatment
Heydenfeldt, J., delivered the opinion of the Court.

Murray, C. J., concurred.

An injunction ought not to be granted in aid of an action of trespass, unless it appear that the injury will be irreparable, and cannot be compensated in damages.

*120In this ease, how the cutting of a ditch through the plaintiff’s land would be such an injury I cannot imagine. It is not sufficient that the affidavit alleges that the injury would be irreparable—it must be shown to the Court how and why it would be so, otherwise the extraordinary remedy of injunction will not be allowed, especially where no action has ever determined the plaintiff's rights.

The injunction in this case ought not to have been granted, and the order dissolving it is affirmed.

Case Details

Case Name: Waldron v. Marsh
Court Name: California Supreme Court
Date Published: Jul 1, 1855
Citation: 5 Cal. 119
Court Abbreviation: Cal.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.