History
  • No items yet
midpage
Walden v. CITY OF PROVIDENCE, RI
596 F.3d 38
1st Cir.
2010
Check Treatment
Docket

THOMAS WALDEN, et al. v. CITY OF PROVIDENCE, RHODE ISLAND, et al.

No. 08-1534, No. 08-1535, No. 08-1536, No. 08-2417

United States Court of Appeals For the First Circuit

February 23, 2010

THOMAS WALDEN, et al., Plaintiffs, Appellees, Cross-Appellants, v. CITY OF PROVIDENCE, RHODE ISLAND, by and through its Treasurer, STEPHEN NAPOLITANO; DAVID CICILLINE, in his official capacity as Mayor and Acting Public Safety Commissioner for the City of Providence; COLONEL DEAN ESSERMAN, in his official capacity as the Chief of Police for the City of Providence, Defendants, Appellants, Cross-Appellees. THOMAS WALDEN, et al., Plaintiffs, Appellees, Cross-Appellants, v. MARY LENNON, individually and in her former official capacity as the Chief of Operations of the Communications Department, Defendant, Appellant, Cross-Appellee. THOMAS WALDEN, et al., Plaintiffs, Appellees, Cross-Appellants, v. MANUEL VIEIRA, individually and in his former official capacity as the Communications Director, Defendant, Appellant, Cross-Appellee. THOMAS WALDEN, et al., Plaintiffs, Appellees, Cross-Appellants, v. CITY OF PROVIDENCE, et al., Defendants, Appellants, Cross-Appellees.

ERRATA SHEET

The opinion of this Court, issued on February 23, 2010, is amended as follows:

On page 17, at line 7, “under” should be inserted between “rights” and “Rhode Island‘s.”

On page 26, at line 21, “ask” should be inserted between “specifically” and “whether.”

On page 41, at line 24, “of” should be inserted between “interpretations” and “the federal wiretap.”

On page 44, at line 13, “state privacy act” should be inserted between “the” and “verdict.”

Case Details

Case Name: Walden v. CITY OF PROVIDENCE, RI
Court Name: Court of Appeals for the First Circuit
Date Published: Mar 15, 2010
Citation: 596 F.3d 38
Docket Number: 08-1534
Court Abbreviation: 1st Cir.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Log In