Wagner v. StateWagner v. State
The defendant absconded during trial where he was charged with trafficking in cocaine. He was convicted of the charges and sentenced, in absentia, to 30 years in prison. After his apprehension, he filed a motion to vacate the sentence which was denied.
The state contends that public policy and a reasonable reading of
(a) presence of defendant. In all prosecutions for crime the defendant shall be present:
....
Our courts have consistently required defendant‘s presence at resentencings, recognizing that sentencing is a critical stage of a criminal proceeding. See, e.g., State v. Scott, 439 So.2d 219 (Fla. 1983); Thacker v. State, 185 So.2d 202 (Fla. 3d DCA 1966). See also Keller v. State, 432 So.2d 672 (Fla. 5th DCA 1983).
Therefore, the order is reversed and the case remanded to the trial court for resentencing.
HERSEY, C.J., and DELL, J., concur.