History
  • No items yet
midpage
Wadsworth v. Champion
1 Root 393
Conn.
1792
Check Treatment
Dyer, J.,

dissented, upon the ground that the averments were positive, that more than lawful interest was included in said note by the corrupt agreement of the parties.

By the Court.

The facts stated and disclosed in the plea do not warrant such an inference, and unless they do, the court cannot make it.

Case Details

Case Name: Wadsworth v. Champion
Court Name: Supreme Court of Connecticut
Date Published: Feb 15, 1792
Citation: 1 Root 393
Court Abbreviation: Conn.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.