History
  • No items yet
midpage
Wade v. Ringo
122 Mo. 322
Mo.
1894
Check Treatment
Per Curiam

(Black, C. J., Brace and Barclay, JJ.)

Having heard arguments of counsel and duly considered the points submitted on plaintiffs appeal, we conclude that the judgment delivered by Judge Hughes is in all respects a correct treatment of the facts of this case and of the law applicable thereto. We therefore deem it unnecessary to repeat what was then said; but, approving his judgment, direct that it be affirmed.

Macearlane, J., did not sit in this cause.

Case Details

Case Name: Wade v. Ringo
Court Name: Supreme Court of Missouri
Date Published: May 28, 1894
Citation: 122 Mo. 322
Court Abbreviation: Mo.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.