Wade v. Jacksonville
55 S. Ct. 87
SCOTUS
1934
Check Treatment
Per Curiam:

The motion of the appellee to dismiss the appeal herein is granted, and the appeal is dismissed (1) for the want of properly presented federal questions (Dewey v. Des Moines, 173 U. S. 193, 197-200; Whitney v. California, 274 U. S. 357, 360, 362, 363; Chicago, Indianapolis & Louisville Ry. Co. v. McGuire, 196 U. S. 128, 131-133; Archerd v. Oregon, 290 U. S. 604), and (2) for the want of a substantial federal question (Castillo v. McConnico, 168 U. S. 674, 681-684; Ballard v. Hunter, 204 U. S. 241, 256, 257; Witherspoon v. Duncan, 4 Wall. 210, 217; Hebert v. Louisiana, 272 U. S. 312, 316, 317).