History
  • No items yet
midpage
Wade v. Bankers Life Ass'n
129 S.W. 1004
Mo. Ct. App.
1910
Check Treatment
ELLISON, J.

This action was brought by plaintiff to recover the amount of a life insurance policy. Defendant insurance company admitted owing the sum, but made it known to the court that there were other claimants, and asking that they be required to inter-plead. The order was made and thence on the contest was between the plaintiff and these claimants. The judgment in the trial court was for the plaintiff and the other claimants have brought the case to this court.

*173Tbe case appears to be of considerable complication, yet plaintiffs in error have failed to make a statement as required by our rules and by section 863 of tbe statutes of 1899. This requirement cannot be dispensed with even by agreement of parties. [Disse v. Frank, 52 Mo. 551; Snyder v. Free, 102 Mo. 325; Mills v. McDaniels, 59 Mo. App. 331.]

Tbe'writ of err or. is dismissed.

All concur.

Case Details

Case Name: Wade v. Bankers Life Ass'n
Court Name: Missouri Court of Appeals
Date Published: Jun 28, 1910
Citation: 129 S.W. 1004
Court Abbreviation: Mo. Ct. App.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.