History
  • No items yet
midpage
Waddle v. Ishe
12 Ala. 308
Ala.
1847
Check Treatment
GOLDTHWAITE, J.

The utmost effect which can be claimed for the proceedings before the justice is, that prima facie the judgment pronounced by him would be considered as upon the merits. But its effect was entirely destroyed as soon as the further fact was disclosed that he dismissed the cause for the reason that his court was without jurisdiction. [Estell v. Tant, 2 Yerg. 467; N. E. Bank v. Lewis, 8 Pick. 113; Hughes v. Blake, 1 Mason, 519.]

Judgment affirmed.

Case Details

Case Name: Waddle v. Ishe
Court Name: Supreme Court of Alabama
Date Published: Jun 15, 1847
Citation: 12 Ala. 308
Court Abbreviation: Ala.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.