History
  • No items yet
midpage
Wada v. Tomlinson
296 F. App'x 77
D.C. Cir.
2008
Check Treatment
Docket

JUDGMENT

This case was considered on the record from the United States District Court for the District of Columbia and on the briefs filed by the parties. The Court has determined that the issues presented occasion no need for oral argument. See D.C.Cir. Rule 34(j). It is

ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the judgment of the district court be affirmed. The appellant has not identified any errors in the district court’s decision.

Pursuant to D.C. Circuit Rule 36, this disposition will not be published. The Clerk is directed to withhold issuance of the mandate herein until seven days after resolution of any timely petition for rehearing en bane. See Fed. R.App. P. 41(b); D.C.Cir. Rule 41.

Case Details

Case Name: Wada v. Tomlinson
Court Name: Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
Date Published: Sep 15, 2008
Citation: 296 F. App'x 77
Docket Number: No. 07-5198
Court Abbreviation: D.C. Cir.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Log In