"$","meta","0",{"name":"viewport","content":"width=device-width, initial-scale=1"}],["$","meta","1",{"charSet":"utf-8"}],["$","title","2",{"children":"Wacker-Wabash Corp. v. City of Chicago, 311 U.S. 606"}],["$","meta","3",{"name":"description","content":"\n Read Wacker-Wabash Corp. v. City of Chicago, 311 U.S. 606 (SCOTUS 1940) for free with midpage's AI-powered interface. Search through and read midpage's comprehensive database of legal opinions.\n "}],["$","link","4",{"rel":"canonical","href":"https://app.midpage.ai/document/wacker-wabash-corp-v-city-of-chicago-8155655"}],["$","meta","5",{"name":"google-site-verification","content":"47d9HJfzq2q0OP3ZqpopFxgpQIsT0oBkwtraeH2SIpE"}],["$","link","6",{"rel":"icon","href":"/midpage.png"}]] 8:null d:null 29:T676, Per Curiam:

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question. Cincinnati Street Ry. Co. v. Snell, 193 U. S. 30, 36; Iowa Central Ry. Co. v. Iowa, 160 U. S. 389, 393; Pittsburgh, C., C. & St. L. Ry. Co. v. Backus,

311 U.S. 606 | SCOTUS | 1940