64 Pa. Commw. 439 | Pa. Commw. Ct. | 1982
Opinion by
Margaret Yula appeals an Unemployment Compensation Board of Review order which denied her benefits. We affirm.
Yula was employed in the office of Giant Eagle Markets, Inc., where she was responsible for processing bottle refunds. She was discharged when she issued credit for $188.00 but only had credit slips to account for $33.00.
Our scope of review where the party with the burden of proof has prevailed below is limited to a determination of questions of law and whether the referee ’s findings of fact are supported by substantial evidence. Maxwell v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review, 54 Pa. Commonwealth Ct. 604, 423 A.2d 430 (1980).
The referee denied Vula benefits finding that her conduct constituted “willful misconduct” under Section 402(e) of the Unemployment Compensation Law.
Since Vula has failed to show good cause for violating her employer’s rule, we conclude her actions constitute willful misconduct.
Affirmed.
Order
The order of the Unemployment Compensation Board of Review, No. B-184538, dated May 30,1980 is affirmed.
Act of December 5, 1936, Second Ex. Sess., P.L. (1937) 2897, as amended, 43 P.S. §802(e).