History
  • No items yet
midpage
13 Johns. 339
N.Y. Sup. Ct.
1816
Per Curiam.

The judgment ds clearly .wrong. If damage be done by any domestic animal, kept for use or convenience, the owner is not liable to an action on the ground of riegligence,. without proof that he knew that the animal was'accustomed to do mischief. (1 Ld. Raym. 109, 2 Ld. Raym. 1583. Buxendin v. Sharp, 2 Salk. 662.)

Judgment reversed, (a)

Notes

1 Chitty on Plead. 69.

Case Details

Case Name: Vrooman v. Lawyer
Court Name: New York Supreme Court
Date Published: Aug 15, 1816
Citation: 13 Johns. 339
Court Abbreviation: N.Y. Sup. Ct.
AI-generated responses must be verified
and are not legal advice.
Log In