History
  • No items yet
midpage
Vredenbergh v. Hallett
1 Johns. Cas. 27
N.Y. Sup. Ct.
1799
Check Treatment
Per Curiam.

The plaintiff must be allowed the interest on the amount of the verdict, until the time of taxing the costs in this action, and the same must be taxed, together with the costs. *

In all actions, founded on contracts carrying interest, and *30delayed under similar circumstances, the . like interest may,, in like manner, be taxed.*(a)

Lord v. The Mayor &c. of New York, 3 Hill, 430, n. (a) and references. People v. Gaine, 1 Johns. R. 343. See also Bissel v. Hopkins, 4 Cowen, 53, but is otherwise when the plaintiff has been the cause of delay. Williams v. Smith, 2 Caines’ R. 253.

Case Details

Case Name: Vredenbergh v. Hallett
Court Name: New York Supreme Court
Date Published: Jan 15, 1799
Citation: 1 Johns. Cas. 27
Court Abbreviation: N.Y. Sup. Ct.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.