| Mo. | Jan 15, 1845
delivered the opinion of the court.
This was an action,commenced by the city of St. Louis, against Von Phul before the city Recorder. Judgment was there given against the defendant Von Phul; and he appealed to the circuit court, where judgment being again given against him, he appealed to this court. The cause was tried before the court without the intervention of a jury. Some evidence was given on each side. After the court had found its verdict and given judgment thereon, the defendant moved for a new trial: Because the verdict was against the evidence, and against law.
No instructions appear to have been asked of the court as to the law of the case : This court is not inclined to reverse judgments of the circuit courts in cases where those courts have expressly decided no point of law. In such case, the appeal seems to be taken rather from the verdict of the jury than the decision of the court.
In a case like this, where the court discharges the duty of a jury as well as its own peculiar duty, it seems more particularly necessary that the appellant should call on the court to decide the law arising on the facts detailed in the evidence. No such decision being made, this court feels no disposition to disturb the verdict rendered by the court sitting as a jury.
The judgment of the circuit court must then be affirmed.