History
  • No items yet
midpage
Voestalpine Stahl Gmbh v. Arcelormittal
16-1407
| Fed. Cir. | Oct 11, 2016
|
Check Treatment
|
Docket

*1 N OTE : This disposition is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________ VOESTALPINE STAHL GMBH, Appellant v.

ARCELORMITTAL, Appellee ______________________ 2016-1407 ______________________ Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in Nos. 95/001,214, 95/001,350, 95/001,353.

______________________ JUDGMENT ______________________ M AXWELL J AMES P ETERSEN , Lewis Brisbois Bisgaard & Smith, LLP, Chicago, IL, argued for appellant.

D AVID J AMES C USHING , Sughrue Mion, PLLC, Wash- ington, DC, argued for appellee. Also represented by R ICHARD C LAY T URNER ; M ARK J AMES D E B OY , Edell Shapiro and Finnan, Gaithersburg, MD.

______________________ T HIS C AUSE having been heard and considered, it is *2 O RDERED and A DJUDGED :

P ER C URIAM (N EWMAN , L OURIE , and C LEVENGER , Circuit Judges ).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36. E NTERED BY O RDER OF THE C OURT October 11, 2016 /s/ Peter R. Marksteiner Date Peter R. Marksteiner

Clerk of Court

Case Details

Case Name: Voestalpine Stahl Gmbh v. Arcelormittal
Court Name: Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Date Published: Oct 11, 2016
Docket Number: 16-1407
Court Abbreviation: Fed. Cir.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.