In the Matter of VLADLENA B., Appellant, v MATHIAS G., Respondent.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department
February 15, 2008
51 A.D.3d 431 | 861 N.Y.S.2d 331
Saxe, J.P., Nardelli, Moskowitz, Acosta and DeGrasse, JJ.
The court’s imputation of equal income to both parties was amply supported by the record. The testimony supported the magistrate’s findings that petitioner maintained a high standard of living and received regular, consistent and recurring financial support from her ex-husband and family.
In high-income cases, the proper determination for an award of child support with respect to parental income in excess of $80,000 should be based on the child’s actual needs and the amount required for a lifestyle appropriate for the child, not the wealth of one or both parties (see Matter of Brim v Combs, 25 AD3d 691, 693 [2006], lv denied 6 NY3d 713 [2006]). Petitioner has failed to provide evidence of the child’s actual expenses, other than testimony found to be incredible. The court set a fair sum of child support ($3,133.34 per month), of which respondent was ordered to pay half. Concur—Saxe, J.P., Nardelli, Moskowitz, Acosta and DeGrasse, JJ.
