History
  • No items yet
midpage
Vivolo v. Catalfumo
262 N.Y.S.2d 421
N.Y. App. Div.
1965
Check Treatment

In a negligence action to recover damages for personal injury, in which the defendant interposed, as a defense, that plaintiff’s claim had been duly released in writing, the defendants appeal from a resettled order of the Supreme Court, Kings County, entered July 20, 1964, which denied their motion for a separate and prior trial on the issue of general release raised by their defense. Order affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements (Mosher v. Mitchell, 22 A D 2d 805, and eases there cited). Christ, Acting P. J., Brennan, Hill, Hopkins and Benjamin, JJ., concur.

Case Details

Case Name: Vivolo v. Catalfumo
Court Name: Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Date Published: Jul 6, 1965
Citation: 262 N.Y.S.2d 421
Court Abbreviation: N.Y. App. Div.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Log In