History
  • No items yet
midpage
447 F.Supp.3d 1071
D. Kan.
2020

VIRGIN MOBILE USA, L.P., Plaintiff, v. DWIGHT D. KEEN, SHARI FEIST ALBRECHT, and SUSAN K. DUFFY, in their official capacities as Commissioners of the Kansas Corporation Commission, Defendants.

Case No. 2:17-CV-2524-JAR

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF KANSAS

March 11, 2020

JULIE A. ROBINSON, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ UNOPPOSED MOTION TO ALTER OR AMEND ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF‘S SUMMARY JUDGMENT MOTION

Having considered the Defendants’ Unopposed Motion to Alter or Amend Order Granting Plaintiff‘s Summary Judgment Motion (Doc. 133), the Court grants the motion and will amend its Memorandum and Order to correct the second sentence of the first full paragraph on page 14 to read: “The KUSF does not assess disbursements to providers from the FUSF High Cost Program.” The remainder of the sentence in the original memorandum is stricken.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: March 11, 2020

S/ Julie A. Robinson

JULIE A. ROBINSON

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case Details

Case Name: Virgin Mobile USA, L.P. v. Pat Apple
Court Name: District Court, D. Kansas
Date Published: Mar 11, 2020
Citations: 447 F.Supp.3d 1071; 2:17-cv-02524
Docket Number: 2:17-cv-02524
Court Abbreviation: D. Kan.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Log In
    Virgin Mobile USA, L.P. v. Pat Apple, 447 F.Supp.3d 1071