John Bruce Vining was convicted of aggravated assault and kidnapping, and he appeals.
1. Appellant contends the conviction of aggravated assault merged with the kidnapping conviction and thus should be vacated. Evidence was adduced that on August 27, 1988, appellant came to the car lot where Gail Fleming worked and inquired about selling his van. While Fleming was checking a reference book, appellant put a noose around her neck, and Larry Stewart, appellant’s co-indictee, suddenly appeared and held a gun to Fleming’s head. Appellant handcuffed Fleming and threw her into the back of his van, which had been spe *817 dally modified to serve as a cage. Appellant then drove the van for a distance, at one point stopping to allow Stewart, who had been in the back with Fleming, to exit the van and enter another vehicle. Fleming testified that appellant showed her a gun with a silencer on it, told her they were searching for money from the sale of illegal drugs allegedly buried by Fleming’s husband, and stated that if she did not cooperate, she would be killed. After Stewart rejoined appellant and Fleming, appellant sat in the back with Fleming and repeatedly threatened her, saying he would kill her if she did not tell them where the money was buried. Fleming was eventually taken into some woods, tied with duct tape, and set down in front of a hole Stewart had dug. The police, contacted by an alert motorist who had seen appellant and another man (Stewart) dragging a bound Fleming out of the van, arrived on the scene and rescued Fleming.
“The crimes of aggravated assault . . . and kidnapping do not necessarily merge as a matter of law, although they may do so as a matter of fact. [Cit.]”
Thornton v. State,
2. Appellant contends the trial court erred by denying his motion for a continuance. The transcript reveals that appellant’s attorney announced ready. Shortly thereafter, appellant asked the trial court for a continuance while his family tried to get a private attorney to work with his appointed attorney as “co-counsel.” “ ‘(T)he announcement of ready constitutes a waiver of defendant’s right to a continuance. (Cit.)’ [Cit.]”
Bennett v. State,
Judgment affirmed.
