History
  • No items yet
midpage
Vincent-Wilday, Inc. v. Strait
273 A.D. 1054
N.Y. App. Div.
1948
Check Treatment

Order reversed on the law and facts, with costs, and motion denied, without costs, and verdict reinstated. Memorandum: Defendant may appeal from the *1055order herein. (Cullen v. Uptegrove, 101 App. Div. 147; O’Reilly v. New York Central R. R. Co., 240 App. Div. 1009.) The defendant was competent to testify as to his past and present condition and as to his ability to work without being caused pain. His testimony thereon was uncontradicted. The reasons assigned by the County Judge for granting the motion were not justified on the evidence. All concur. (The order grants plaintiff’s motion for a new trial unless defendant stipulates to reduce the verdict in favor of him on his counterclaim, in an automobile negligence action.) Present — Taylor, P. J., McCum, Love, Vaughan and Kimball, JJ.

Case Details

Case Name: Vincent-Wilday, Inc. v. Strait
Court Name: Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Date Published: May 12, 1948
Citation: 273 A.D. 1054
Court Abbreviation: N.Y. App. Div.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.