History
  • No items yet
midpage
Vincent v. California
149 U.S. 648
SCOTUS
1893
Check Treatment

This case, which will be found reported in 95 California, 425, differs in no essential respect from that of McNulty, just considered. For the reasons given in the foregoing opinion, the writ of error must be Dismissed.

Mr. William H. H. Hart, Attorney General of the State of California, for the motion to dismiss. Mr. Carroll Cook opposing.

Case Details

Case Name: Vincent v. California
Court Name: Supreme Court of the United States
Date Published: May 15, 1893
Citation: 149 U.S. 648
Docket Number: No. 1316
Court Abbreviation: SCOTUS
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Log In