History
  • No items yet
midpage
Villa v. State
89 Ind. App. 49
| Ind. Ct. App. | 1929
|
Check Treatment

The only question sought to be presented by this appeal is the alleged error of the court in the giving to the jury of one certain instruction. It is now well settled that when error is predicated upon the action of the trial court in the giving or refusing to give instructions to the jury, the appellant is required by cl. 5 of Rule 22 of this court to set out in his brief all of the instructions given by the court. Linn Grove,etc., Power Co. v. Fennig (1927), 86 Ind. App. 170,154 N.E. 877; Hiser v. Lichfield (1926), 87 Ind. App. 19,154 N.E. 510; Guetling v. State (1927), 198 Ind. 718, 153 N.E. 765.

The court's instructions are not set out in appellant's brief.

Affirmed. *Page 50

Case Details

Case Name: Villa v. State
Court Name: Indiana Court of Appeals
Date Published: Mar 29, 1929
Citation: 89 Ind. App. 49
Docket Number: No. 13,641.
Court Abbreviation: Ind. Ct. App.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.