306 So. 2d 564 | Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | 1975
On the occasion of the third appearance of this case no useful purpose will be served by any further recitation of the facts. Suffice it to say that the trial court has apparently failed to fully appreciate the import of our prior decisions.
Affirmed, in part; reversed, in part.
. Vietor v. Sill, Fla.App.1973, 272 So.2d 173; Victor v. Sill, Fla.App.1971, 243 So.2d 198.
. In ascertaining the amount of any damages, computations shall begin on the date notice was received of plaintiff’s agreement to buy the subject property, December 6, 1968 through the date plaintiff received possession of the subject i>roperty. In addition, the defendant Sill shall be entitled to interest on the purchase price accruing from December 6, 1968 through and including the date on which plaintiff deposited the purchase money into the registry of the court.
.In particular, the claim for attorney’s fees is disallowed.