History
  • No items yet
midpage
Viera v. State
15-1604
| Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | May 31, 2017
|
Check Treatment

*1 Before ROTHENBERG, EMAS, and FERNANDEZ, JJ.

ON MOTION FOR REHEARING OR FOR WRITTEN OPINION PER CURIAM.

We deny the appellant’s motion for rehearing, but grant his motion for written opinion, withdraw our per curiam affirmance issued on April 26, 2017, and substitute the following opinion in its place.

We affirm the defendant’s convictions and sentences for aggravated battery, see Boyd v. State, 910 So. 2d 167 (Fla. 2005), but remand the cause to the trial court for the sole purpose of entering a written competency order nunc pro tunc. See Fla. R. Crim. P. 3.212(b); Mullens v. State, 197 So. 3d 16 (Fla. 2016); Dougherty v. State, 149 So. 3d. 672 (Fla. 2014).

Affirmed and remanded with directions.

2

Case Details

Case Name: Viera v. State
Court Name: District Court of Appeal of Florida
Date Published: May 31, 2017
Docket Number: 15-1604
Court Abbreviation: Fla. Dist. Ct. App.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.