Vidal-Ortiz v. FischerVidal-Ortiz v. Fischer
During the course of an investigation, it was determined that petitioner sold marihuana to a confidential informant on two occasions. When petitioner did not receive payment for the second sale, he approached the informant in the yard, accompanied by four or five unidentified Spanish-speaking
We confirm. The misbehavior report, together with the testimony of the correction officer who prepared it and the confidential testimony considered by the Hearing Officer in camera, provide substantial evidence supporting the determination of guilt (see Matter of Washington v Fischer, 74 AD3d 1659, 1659 [2010]; Matter of Griffith v Selsky, 53 AD3d 884 [2008]). Petitioner‘s denial of any wrongdoing presented a credibility issue for the Hearing Officer to resolve (see Matter of Rivera v Selsky, 43 AD3d 1210, 1210 [2007]; Matter of Jackson v Goord, 8 AD3d 852, 853 [2004]). His remaining claims are unpreserved due to his failure to raise them at the disciplinary hearing.
Mercure, J.P, Lahtinen, Malone Jr., Kavanagh and Egan Jr., JJ., concur. Adjudged that the determination is confirmed, without costs, and petition dismissed.