midpage

Victor v. NebraskaVictor v. Nebraska

Supreme Court of the United States
Feb 25, 1991
No. 90-6259; No. 90-6578; No. 90-6639; No. 90-6640; No. 90-6682; No. 90-6711; No. 90-6739
Versions:498 U.S. 1127

Lead Opinion

Sup. Ct. Neb.;

Sup. Ct. Ariz.;

Sup. Ct. Ala.;

Sup. Ct. Tenn.;

Sup. Ct. Ill.;

Sup. Ct. Ohio; and

C. A. 8th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: No. 90-6259, 235 Neb. 770, 457 N. W. 2d 431; No. 90-6578, 165 Ariz. 51, 796 P. 2d 853; No. 90-6639, 554 So. 2d 1111; No. 90-6682, 137 Ill. 2d 500, 561 N. E. 2d 57; No. 90-6711, 53 Ohio St. 3d 107, 559 N. E. 2d 710; No. 90-6739, 912 F. 2d 924.






Dissenting Opinion

Justice Marshall,

dissenting.

Adhering to my view that the death penalty is in all circumstances cruel and unusual punishment prohibited by the Eighth and Fourteenth Amendments, Gregg v. Georgia, 428 U. S. 153, 231 (1976), I would grant certiorari and vacate the death sentences in these cases.

Case Details

Case Name: Victor v. Nebraska
Court Name: Supreme Court of the United States
Date Published: Feb 25, 1991
Citations: 498 U.S. 1127; No. 90-6259; No. 90-6578; No. 90-6639; No. 90-6640; No. 90-6682; No. 90-6711; No. 90-6739
Docket Number: No. 90-6259; No. 90-6578; No. 90-6639; No. 90-6640; No. 90-6682; No. 90-6711; No. 90-6739
Court Abbreviation: U.S.
Log In