Vickers v. StateVickers v. State
By way of this appeal, appellant challenges his conviction of two counts of breaking and entering with the intent to commit a felony on the basis that the state failed to proffer the necessary testimony to establish the requisite value of the property taken, sufficient to support a conviction of the crime charged.
Testimony was adduced at the trial by one owner as to the items stolen and that in her opinion the aggregate value of the items taken from her home exceeded $100.00.1 As to the second breaking and entering, a witness testified that in his opinion the items stolen were worth over $150.00.2
It is not necessary to adduce expert witnesses to testify as to the market value of goods at the time of the theft.
By way of caveat, it would be the far better practice if the state, when adducing testimony as to the market value, would simply ask the witness so testifying as to what is his opinion as to the market value of the goods.
The judgment appealed is affirmed.
RAWLS, C.J., and JOHNSON and McCORD, JJ., concur.