History
  • No items yet
midpage
Vetrick v. Hollander
464 So. 2d 552
Fla.
1985
Check Treatment
OVERTON, Justice.

The Supreme Court of Florida does not have common law certiorari jurisdiction. Art. V, § 3, Fla. Const. The “Petition for Writ of Certiorari” will, therefore, be treated as a petition for discretionary review and/or appeal. See Fla.R.App.P. 9.040(c).

Because no jurisdictional basis has been alleged to support the petition for discretionary review or the appeal, this case is hereby dismissed. See St. Paul Title Insurance Corp. v. Davis, 392 So.2d 1304 (Fla.1980); Jenkins v. State, 385 So.2d 1356 (Fla.1980).

The appeal is subject to reinstatement if jurisdiction is established on proper motion filed within fifteen days from the date of this order. See Art. V, § 3(b)(1), Fla. Const.

No motion for rehearing or for clarification may be filed in the Court addressed to the denial of the petition for discretionary review. See Fla.R.App.P. 9.330(d).

It is so ordered.

BOYD, C.J., and ADKINS, OVERTON, ALDERMAN, McDONALD, EHRLICH and SHAW, JJ., concur.

Case Details

Case Name: Vetrick v. Hollander
Court Name: Supreme Court of Florida
Date Published: Feb 21, 1985
Citation: 464 So. 2d 552
Docket Number: No. 66358
Court Abbreviation: Fla.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.