*2 WINTER, HALL, Before CRAVEN and This was established by cumulative reports Judges. and interpretations. The Appeals Council Richardson, 773, See ployment Blalock 483 F.2d in a mine or mines in which the previously engaged regularity with some period over of time. disability” 2. “Total is defined in terms of the 902(f). U.S.C. § given meaning regulations of the Sec- retary HEW, except the Coal Mine 3. “Pneumoconiosis” is defined as a chronic Safety Health Act of as amended lung arising dust disease employ- of the out of Lung Black Benefits Act mandates 902(b). ment in a coal mine. 30 U.S.C. § regulations provide that such shall that a miner when, shall be considered as a fully qualified 4. The claimant otherwise for pneumoconiosis, result of he is en- unable to widow’s benefits. 20 CFR 410.210. gage employment requiring the skills and abilities to those of necessity Health, willingness economic Education Department for able, management sympa- felt finding as that work adopted and Welfare the deceased and denying thy provided light for for The basis Secretary. him, her even could not for benefits labor application widow’s regularly. The record further her husband reflects showing that failure *3 miner pre- great pain the deceased suffered pneumoconiosis, to due totally working or comparable During not. the last engaging in whether from venting him life, only $1,243. his he earnings record of earned six months The work. gainful and low, considerably miner, pov- was held amount below the although This deceased erty to a level.6 warrant sufficiently consistent to gainfully he had been declaration a substan- regularity over with some
ployed II. Even Collins time.5 period of tial THE BELOW RULINGS to work much of sick work, was too he testimony ground were denied on the Benefits uncontradicted The the time. show that only one-third failed to at the time work the widow could that he was death, life, he he was year husband’s dis- last of her time. able, pneumoconiosis. was and With he due to the de- work when abled just “would having at a time established the two weeks miner exist- ceased maybe sometimes a simple pneumoconiosis, that he couldn’t rebuttable be down ence he’d shots arises widow is enti- get he’d presumption . two or benefits. 30 to work to the U.S.C. be able tled maybe he’d and affirmed, The deceased In his decision which was next week.” 921. days the three work- Law as “sometimes held that a the Administrative described He part of his life. rebutted evidence presumption latter during the er” doing when he could his usual mines the miner in the to work tried work, children to wife and four and had a mine he because way 410.490(c); no he knew other 20 CFR 30 because work. and support, a 902(f). had no more than living. He make a to education, military experi- no grade seventh training. When it
ence,
no vocational
III.
so,
to
he worked
possible
do
physically
AND
DISCUSSION
REASONS
strong will
of his
mines because
the coal
REVERSAL
FOR
physical
accept
He refused
do so.
to.
to
living totally
be forced into
are certain limited circum
and thus
There
defeat
Up
can,
until
Col-
through
which miner
benefits.
under
welfare
stances
from
determination,
loader”,
requir-
joba
continue to work
a “coal
as
sheer
worked
lins
After
disabled.
In
effort.
1964
order
qualify
still
strenuous
category
this narrow
of “working
Collins was
within
unfortunate
fit
up until
disabled”,
necessary
operating ma-
for
claimant to
tasks such as
lighter
given
that the miner’s work attendance was
jobs.
odd
Because
doing other
show
chines
Earnings
Security Administration
Year
of the Social
Records
2,453.50
miner’s
the deceased
reveal
1964
years
be as follows:
3,224.04
of his life to
last 9'/a
months)
1,243.00
(6
Earnings
According
United
Bureau of
to the
States
$3,169.94
Statistics,
poverty statistics for West
Labor
2,998.12
poverty
Virginia
the maximum
show
2,265.92
$4,135
family
this size to
an
for a
level
2,448.85
area,
$2,900
ain
rural area. Based
urban
2,995.63
record,
family
fit in
would
2,502.54
Collins
on the
3,544.88
category.
the rural
performance
congenital
had
poor,
sporadic, his
and his
marked curvature of the
marginal.7
spine,
Dellosa
and could
Weinberger,
not stoop,
lift,
bend or
(E.D.Pa.1974), presents
F.Supp.
pain
suffered
he sat for more than 10
to the instant case.
situation similar
constantly
minutes and
while standing.
Dellosa,
coal miner
a deceased
had worked The fact that he chose to work daily as a
and suffered at
in coal mines for
family
support
dishwasher
did not
He was
simple pneumoconiosis.
from
disability
least
bar his entitlement
benefits.
During the last
killed in a mine accident.
Although
eight
Leftwich was at work for
hours,
actually
life,
only
he could work
he
worked
year
days
of his
two
four to five
week,
day.
unsatisfactorily
per
and then
hours
This
without
Court refused to pun-
year
co-workers.
simply
assistance from
be-
ish the claimant
because
sought
he
died,
$2,744.46,
fore he
high-
earned
support
his family, despite physical prob-
*4
10
past
years.
est sum in the
The Adminis-
Further,
doing
so.
lems
in Wilson v.
Judge
trative Law
nevertheless found
Richardson,
that
(4th
9. This Court took increase United Celebrezze, knowledge in v. Workers of Cooke America from to 1966 common Labor, Dept. Bureau of Statistics 34.25%. 9-14, 1799, (1973), Wage Chronology, 17. Bull. Overall, Deas, Joseph Jr., I do not doubt that at the time of appellant pro se. engaged “in his death Collins Potts, Jack appellee pro se. employment requiring skills and abili- to those of employment ties RUSSELL, Before Circuit Judge, FIELD, a mine or mines in which previously [he] Judge, Senior WIDENER, Cir- engaged with some regularity and over a Judge. cuit period of time.” 30 U.S.C. 902(f). It finding follows that the that he PER CURIAM: not disabled should be unassailable. Deas, Jr.,
Joseph seeks to sue under 42 1983 the attorney whom he re- represent tained to him in a criminal mat- alleges ter. He representation op- deprive erated to him of his constitutionally guaranteed to the effective assistance ri£ht and, counsel, further, that the defendant Joseph DEAS, Jr., Appellant, $1,000 failed to return to Deas after he was discharged. The complaint seeks recovery $1,000 of this as well as additional amounts Attorney POTTS, Appellee. Jack compensatory and punitive damages. No. 76-2390.* private A attorney who is retained to United States Appeals, Court of represent a criminal defendant is not acting Fourth Circuit. law, under color of state and therefore is not amenable to suit under § 1983. Nelson 1, Submitted Oct. Stratton, 14, Decided Dec. denied, cert. U.S. 93 S.Ct. (1973); Szijarto
L.Ed.2d
v. Legeman,
*6
Cir. 1972); Shelton v.
Randolph,
Accordingly, leave proceed in forma pauperis granted and the judgment of the district court affirmed. * Formerly 76-8258.
