32 Minn. 499 | Minn. | 1884
In an action for divorce, where one of the issues to he determined is, who shall have custody of the minor children, it
In the case at bar some of the allegations stricken out of the answer were clearly irrelevant. The others were at least redundant, being, at most, mere matters of evidence tending to prove that plaintiff was not a fit person to have custody of his child. They were, therefore, all properly stricken out. This is the only question before us, the defendant having voluntarily answered, and the appeal being from the. order striking out portions of the answer.
Order affirmed.