No. 89-1783 | Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Feb 6, 1990
The defendants’ failure twice to satisfactorily answer the plaintiffs’ interrogatories did not justify striking their pleadings and entering a default against them. See Summit Chase Condominium Ass’n v. Protean Investors, Inc., 421 So. 2d 562" date_filed="1982-09-28" court="Fla. Dist. Ct. App." case_name="SUMMIT CHASE COND. ASSOC., INC. v. Protean Investors, Inc.">421 So.2d 562 (Fla. 3d DCA 1982). Accordingly, the orders under review are reversed without prejudice to consideration of any appropriate lesser sanction.