Vento v. City of New YorkVento v. City of New York
In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the defendant John J. Dalton appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Richmond County (Mastro, J.), dated January 17, 1997, which granted the plaintiffs motion for leave to enter a judgment on liability upon his default in answering or appearing and denied his cross motion, inter alia, to vacate his default.
Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.
Initially we note that even if the opposition papers and cross motion were untimely served, the Supreme Court providently exercised its discretion in overlooking the late service inasmuch as the plaintiff was not prejudiced thereby (see, Adler v Gordon,
In any event, the appellant’s submissions were insufficient to establish either that he did not receive the summons and complaint (see, Manhattan Sav. Bank v Kohen,
The issue of whether the process server’s attempts to serve the appellant constituted “due diligence” justifying service under CPLR 308 (4) was not raised in the Supreme Court and, therefore, is not properly before us. Were we to reach the issue, however, we would conclude that the process server’s efforts were sufficient to constitute “due diligence” (see, Kelly v Lewis,