Venino v. Naegele
100 N.J. Eq. 357 | N.J. | 1926
The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion of the court below.
For affirmance — The Ohiee-Justice, Tbehchaed, Pae-KEE, MlHTUBH, KaLISCH, ¿LACK, KaTZEHBACH, CAMPBELL, Lloyd, White, Gabdheb, Yah Buskiek, McGlehhoh, Kays, Hetpield, JJ. 15.
For reversal — -None.