Defendant was tried before a jury and convicted of trafficking in cocaine in violation of the Georgia Controlled Substances Act. Defendant now challenges the denial of his motion for new trial and motion in limine to suppress cocaine that was found in his gym bag during a roadside search of a car in which he was a passenger. The facts relevant to these assertions, construed most favorably toward the trial court’s findings and judgment
(Morgan v. State,
Defendant contends the search of Chesley’s car cannot be justified because there was nothing which authorized his arrest prior to Officer Mitchum’s search.
Since Chesley was lawfully arrested for operating a car without a driver’s license and for not having proof of insurance
(Wilder v. State,
Defendant cites
Bowen v. State,
The trial court did not err in denying defendant’s motion to suppress and his motion for new trial. 1
Judgment affirmed.
Notes
Because the search of defendant’s gym bag was valid pursuant to a lawful arrest, we do not address defendant’s assertion that the search of Chesley’s car was pursuant to the
*321
unauthorized impoundment other car. Compare
Gooden v. State,
