History
  • No items yet
midpage
Veeder v. Fiske
6 N.M. 288
N.M.
1891
Check Treatment

OPINION.

Per Curiam.

The judgment below is regular on its face, and it was not opened or set aside. The order for restitution duly followed the judgment, being a necessary incident. If its execution injuriously affected ■a stranger to the record, he had an obvious remedy by ■an independent action, but no right to any summary proceedings affecting the judgment or its result. Therefore, the order vacating the order for restitution was by an inadvertence irregularly made, and must be reversed, and the cause remanded to the district court for further action not inconsistent with this opinion.

Case Details

Case Name: Veeder v. Fiske
Court Name: New Mexico Supreme Court
Date Published: Aug 21, 1891
Citation: 6 N.M. 288
Docket Number: No. 479
Court Abbreviation: N.M.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.