Veasey v. State

May 18, 1909
1757
Reporters:
, ,
Before:
Hill
Hill, C. J.

1. Th.e remarks of the solicitor were ‍‌‌​‌‌‌‌​‌​​​​​‌‌‌​‌​‌‌​‌​‌​‌​‌‌‌‌​​​​‌‌‌‌​​‌‌​‌​‌‌​​​​‌‌​‌‌‌‌​‌‌‌​​‌‌‌‌​​​‌​​​‌​‌‌​​​‌‌‌​‌‌​​‌​‌‍entirely legitimate, under the evidence, and, even if objectionable, would not be a ground for a ‍‌‌​‌‌‌‌​‌​​​​​‌‌‌​‌​‌‌​‌​‌​‌​‌‌‌‌​​​​‌‌‌‌​​‌‌​‌​‌‌​​​​‌‌​‌‌‌‌​‌‌‌​​‌‌‌‌​​​‌​​​‌​‌‌​​​‌‌‌​‌‌​​‌​‌‍new trial, unless they were objected to at the time and some appropriate action of .the court ‍‌‌​‌‌‌‌​‌​​​​​‌‌‌​‌​‌‌​‌​‌​‌​‌‌‌‌​​​​‌‌‌‌​​‌‌​‌​‌‌​​​​‌‌​‌‌‌‌​‌‌‌​​‌‌‌‌​​​‌​​​‌​‌‌​​​‌‌‌​‌‌​​‌​‌‍then invoked. Civil Code, §4419; Odell v. State, 120 Ga. 152 (47 S. E. 577); Southern Ry. Co. v. Wright, ante, 172 (64 S. E. 703).

2. No ‍‌‌​‌‌‌‌​‌​​​​​‌‌‌​‌​‌‌​‌​‌​‌​‌‌‌‌​​​​‌‌‌‌​​‌‌​‌​‌‌​​​​‌‌​‌‌‌‌​‌‌‌​​‌‌‌‌​​​‌​​​‌​‌‌​​​‌‌‌​‌‌​​‌​‌‍error of law appears, and there is some evidence, although weak and unsatisfactory, to support the ‍‌‌​‌‌‌‌​‌​​​​​‌‌‌​‌​‌‌​‌​‌​‌​‌‌‌‌​​​​‌‌‌‌​​‌‌​‌​‌‌​​​​‌‌​‌‌‌‌​‌‌‌​​‌‌‌‌​​​‌​​​‌​‌‌​​​‌‌‌​‌‌​​‌​‌‍verdict, which was approved by the trial judge. Judgment affirmed.