History
  • No items yet
midpage
Vaval v. State
792 So. 2d 649
Fla. Dist. Ct. App.
2001
Check Treatment
PER CURIAM.

Defendant appeals from the denial of his motion for postconviction relief. We affirm. See Saldana v. State, 786 So.2d 643 (Fla. 3d DCA 2001) (“Advising a defendant that he or she is under investigation is not the same thing as being threatened with deportation.”); see also Kindelan v. State, 786 So.2d 599 (Fla. 3d DCA 2001); Rodriguez v. State, 789 So.2d 548 (Fla. 3d DCA 2001). This affirmance is without prejudice to defendant refiling his 3.850 motion should the investigation lead to the threat of deportation.

Case Details

Case Name: Vaval v. State
Court Name: District Court of Appeal of Florida
Date Published: Aug 29, 2001
Citation: 792 So. 2d 649
Docket Number: No. 3D01-1729
Court Abbreviation: Fla. Dist. Ct. App.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.