Vaval v. State, 792 So. 2d 649

PER CURIAM.

Defendant appeals from the denial of his motion for postconviction relief. We affirm. See Saldana v. State, 786 So.2d 643 (Fla. 3d DCA 2001) (“Advising a defendant that he or she is under investigation is not the same thing as being threatened with deportation.”); see also Kindelan v. State, 786 So.2d 599 (Fla. 3d DCA 2001); Rodriguez v. State, 789 So.2d 548 (Fla. 3d DCA 2001). This affirmance is without prejudice to defendant refiling his 3.850 motion should the investigation lead to the threat of deportation.

Case Details

Case Name: Vaval v. State

Court Name: District Court of Appeal of Florida

Date Published: Aug 29, 2001

Citations: 792 So. 2d 649; 2001 WL 984491; 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 12137; No. 3D01-1729

Docket Number: No. 3D01-1729

Court Abbreviation: Fla. Dist. Ct. App.