The evidence in this case was wholly circumstantial and did not exclude every reasonable hypothesis save that of the defendant’s guilt. The court, therefore, erred in overruling the motion for a new trial. Judgment reversed.
Luke and Bloodworth, JJ., concur.Tyson & Tyson, for plaintiff in error.J. Saxton Daniel, contra.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.
