Vaughn v. State

Jan 11, 1923
14066
Versions:29 Ga. App. 388
115 S.E. 670
1923 Ga. App. LEXIS 21
Broyles, C. J.

The evidence in this case was wholly circumstantial and did not exclude every reasonable hypothesis save that of the defendant’s guilt. The court, therefore, erred in overruling the motion for a new trial. Judgment reversed.

Luke and Bloodworth, JJ., concur. Tyson & Tyson, for plaintiff in error. J. Saxton Daniel, contra.