History
  • No items yet
midpage
Vaughn v. . Deloatch
65 N.C. 378
N.C.
1871
Check Treatment

The plaintiff declared on a single bill, the execution of which was admitted; the defendants relied upon the pleas, of fully administered and no assets.

Upon the trial of these issues the plaintiff offered to show, that at the time of the death of James Buie (the intestate of the defendant, E. A. Martin,) he was seized and possessed of certain real estate which the defendant Martin neglected to sell and convert into assets. The defendant objected to this evidence, upon the ground that in this action he was not chargeable with the value of the real estate as assets. His *Page 291 Honor overruled the objection and admitted the evidence. Verdict for plaintiff. Rule, etc. Judgment and appeal. The only question is, whether real estate is assets to pay debts before the same has been sold, and the proceeds received by the administrator?

Recent decisions settle the question in the negative. 64 N.C. Fike v.Green, and the cases there cited.

It may be, that in a case of negligence the administrator would be liable on his bond for not obtaining license and selling; (379) but that is not before us.

There is error.

Per curiam.

Venire de novo.

Cited: Hawkins v. Carpenter, 88 N.C. 406; Wilson v. Bynum, 92 N.C. 723.

Case Details

Case Name: Vaughn v. . Deloatch
Court Name: Supreme Court of North Carolina
Date Published: Jun 5, 1871
Citation: 65 N.C. 378
Court Abbreviation: N.C.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.