History
  • No items yet
midpage
Vaughan v. McGannon
52 Ark. 244
Ark.
1889
Check Treatment
Per Curiam.

partnership: Pleading: Evidence. If Sanders and McGannon were partners, and the due bill in question was executed by one of them in the name of the partnership business as evidence of a partnership debt, it was the liability of both. No amendment of the plaintiff’s pleadings was necessary to authorize proof of the partnership. The court erred in excluding the testimony relating to that fact.

Reverse and remand.

Case Details

Case Name: Vaughan v. McGannon
Court Name: Supreme Court of Arkansas
Date Published: May 15, 1889
Citation: 52 Ark. 244
Court Abbreviation: Ark.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.