Vaughan v. McGannon

52 Ark. 244 | Ark. | 1889

Per Curiam.

partnership: Pleading: Evidence. If Sanders and McGannon were partners, and the due bill in question was executed by one of them in the name of the partnership business as evidence of a partnership debt, it was the liability of both. No amendment of the plaintiff’s pleadings was necessary to authorize proof of the partnership. The court erred in excluding the testimony relating to that fact.

Reverse and remand.

midpage