History
  • No items yet
midpage
Vary v. Godfrey
6 Cow. 587
N.Y. Sup. Ct.
1827
Check Treatment
Curia.

This affidavit does not come within the rule laid down in Taylor v. Hatch, (12 John. Rep. 340.) That applies only to affidavits made before an attorney in a suit pending; not to those preparatory to the commencement of one. The affidavit is not entitled; and the attorney may or may not be retained at the time when the affidavit is made. The rule is thus qualified by the English cases. (Haward v. Nalder, Barnes, 60.) The motion must be denied.

Motion denied.

Case Details

Case Name: Vary v. Godfrey
Court Name: New York Supreme Court
Date Published: Feb 15, 1827
Citation: 6 Cow. 587
Court Abbreviation: N.Y. Sup. Ct.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.