Vanliner Ins. Co. v. Thomas Fay Ins. A., No. Cv98 035 20 37 (Jan. 19, 2001), 2001 Conn. Super. Ct. 1202

Vanliner Ins. Co. v. Thomas Fay Ins. A., No. Cv98 035 20 37 (Jan. 19, 2001)

2001 Conn. Super. Ct. 1202

| Conn. Super. Ct. | 2001

Check Treatment

[EDITOR'S NOTE: This case is unpublished as indicated by the issuing court.]

MEMORANDUM OF DECISION RE: DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT The issue of the appropriateness of the CRB decision concerning the timeliness of the filing of notice is on appeal to the Appellate Court. CT Page 1203

To adopt defendant's position. this court would be required to accept his position that the notice was filed in a timely fashion.

The court is unwilling to adopt defendant's position. Whether or not the notice was timely tiled is a material fact in dispute. To rule otherwise would be to usurp appellate jurisdiction in CRB matters which the legislature clearly assigned to the Appellate Court.

The Motion of Summary Judgment is denied.

The Court

Daniel E. Brennan, Jr.