History
  • No items yet
midpage
Vanhouten v. Vagen
22 Ind. 274
Ind.
1864
Check Treatment
Per Curiam.

In this case the question attempted to be raised is in reference to the. ruling of the Court in striking out the second paragraph of the answer. There is no bill of exceptions presenting to us the pleading so stricken out, and it is not, therefore, before us; Adkins v. Hudson, 11 Ind. 372; nor does the fact that it was contained in the transcript of the justice, before whom the suit was commenced, change the rule. Grow v. Studabaker, 14 id. 519.

Coleriek J- Jordan, for the appellant. W. P. Fishback, for the appellee.

The judgment is affirmed, with 8 per cent, damages and costs.

Case Details

Case Name: Vanhouten v. Vagen
Court Name: Indiana Supreme Court
Date Published: May 15, 1864
Citation: 22 Ind. 274
Court Abbreviation: Ind.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.